Search Results for: lars monsen

The new Y tree at Family Tree DNA and our Munson R-P312 Y

MunsonNewYThe new Y tree released this past week by Family Tree DNA has dropped all those horrible long names like R1b1b1a1 and replaced them with the main Y  haplogroup followed by the terminal SNP. This had long been suggested as a better nomenclature. The downside is that you have to look at a chart to see how an R-P311 might be related to an R-P312 but it is worth it for the simplification of the name. Although I think we R1b’s are used to being different from the R1a’s and I would prefer that we were R1b-P312

The new Y tree combines the research of Family Tree DNA and the Genographic project.  The press release and its highlights are published on Emily Aulicino’s blog:

http://genealem-geneticgenealogy.blogspot.com/2014/04/family-tree-dna-2014-y-dna-haplogroup.html

and Debbie Kennett’s blog goes into deeper details:

http://cruwys.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-new-2014-y-dna-haplotree-has-arrived.html

 

But what does this mean for us R1b Munsons? Are we Scottish or Germanic? Where did our earliest known paternal line ancestor, Mons Knutson Titland  1665-1725 , who farmed a little north of Bergen, come from? Does our Y DNA tell us?
Continue reading

What to do with your DNA test

Some of my cousins and friends have tested at 23andme or familytreeDNA, due to my urging, and now they are asking me what to do next. I dedicate this post to them.

Autosomal DNA testing will not not magically find your ancestors. You will need to work at it and may have very little success if not enough of your known and unknown relatives have tested. It will give you many clues and hints about where your ancestors were from. Be sure to use some of the admix tools at GEDmatch.com on your results if that interests you, see my post on GEDmatch.

I suggest that if you are not familiar with DNA or DNA testing that you read my DNA basics page and if you have tested at 23andme also read my post on 23andme basics.

Assuming that you all do not want to spend the kind of time on this that I do (an hour or two most days for the last year); here is how to get the most for the least time input.

First you need to understand that an autosomal DNA test is nowhere near as definitive as a Y chromosome test, it can show you that you are related because you share runs of identical SNPs (referred to as segment matches from here on) with someone but not exactly how or even how close. After the 2nd cousin level the amount you will share with a relative gets more and more random. I have a few 9th cousins I share a one segment match with who like me have extensive trees and that is the closest match we have found. ISOGG has published the expected ranges of cMs and number of segments on their wiki that relatives share at different levels of relationship.

So what was your objective taking the DNA test? If it was just to satisfy your curiosity then my post on 23andme basics should answer your questions. If finding new relatives is of interest then read on.

Continue reading

Reading Norwegian Churchbooks

My cousin Dick Larkin has put together a wonderful guide to reading Norwegian churchbooks which is now available in our downloads section. It includes many charts, urls, and images of handwriting. Since so many Norwegian records are online at http://arkivverket.no/eng/content/view/full/629 – this is great help in doing genealogical research. While the census records there are transcribed to typewritten entries and easy to use, the church records require pouring through the images of handwritten entries so help or skill is needed to interpret them.

Here are a few excerpts from his guide:

“If you have chosen your parents wisely, your genealogical research will include Norwegian records.  Norway has one of the most readily accessible bodies of genealogical data of any country outside the United States; the ‘Kirkeboker’, or churchbooks, are an important part of those data.  They are the primary repository of data on births, marriages, and deaths for roughly the period 1670 to 1930, and, best of all, they are online and accessible without cost. Their only real downside is that they can be a challenge to read. This paper will help you overcome that challenge.

and how to figure out which churchbook:
“There are three ways to start: – First and best is to scour your own family records, certificates, Bibles, letters, diaries, and the like, and to inquire of elderly living relatives for clues as to where in Norway your ancestors came from. – Second is to look on Rootsweb (www.rootsweb.ancestry.com) to see if someone else has been researching your family and has posted their family tree data there. – Third is to use theFamilySearch website, but this may or may not be very helpful without at least some other clues. For example, this search lists over 137,000 people named Ole Olsen born in Norway between 1650 and 1930. Two ways to narrow this search are first by date of birth (or other known or closely estimated date); second is by location – at least at the county level. But even narrowing the search to Vest Agder County, and birth years 1800 to 1830 still gives 692 Ole Olsens. Death records in the United States sometimes identify a birth location in Norway; a farm name may give a clue (but a given farm name will likely be found in multiple communities and counties).
 [Editor’s note  when your ancestors names do not end in -sen or -son they have probably taken their farm name as their surname in this country for example Sande, Hauge, Skjold, and Tveit are all farm names. The familysearch listings for specific counties usually give a list of farm names but these may not be complete so try googling for the farm name with the words farm and norway. For example, googling for “tveit farm norway” turns up farms in at least four different counties.]

Continue reading

DNA basics

Overview of DNA and chromosomes

We each have 23 pairs of chromosomes containing DNA plus we have some more DNA that can be tested in our mitochondria (mtDNA), the little organisms that make a cell’s energy. In human DNA, chromosomes 1 through 22 recombine for reproduction.
Brynne Ancestor MapA child gets one copy of each chromosome from each parent, thus a pair. However all of these first 22 chromosomes will be a mix of the genes from that parent’s parents. The DNA from the parent’s two copies of each chromosome is randomly recombined to make a single new version of that chromosome which is then passed on. This way siblings can inherit quite different DNA from their parents although normally they share about 50% with each other (see the diagram in my blog post for the comparison between me and my brother, we share 47%).

A really lovely example of four generations of DNA inheritance was done by Angie Bush for a presentation and discussed in one of my blog posts. The image here,  which shows the eight known sources of her daughter’s DNA, was made by Angie.

 

The X and the Y: the 23rd chromosome pair

The 23rd chromosome pair is either an XX for a girl or an XY for a boy. One X chromosome will be a recombined mixture from the mother’s parents but the second X for a girl is an unrecombined X from her father (recombined by her father’s mother) since he has only one X chromosome to pass along to her. To his sons he passes a Y which is what makes them boys not girls.

The fact that the X does not get recombined by fathers means that matches on the X chromosome can reach much further back in time than the other chromosomes, since they may not have been recombined as often. Another thing to note about the X is that a number of conditions like hemophilia, color blindness, and baldness are governed by recessive genes on the X so are infrequent in women who need two copies of that gene as compared to men who need only one copy since the Y is a blank for those genes. This type of gene is called sex-linked.

The Y chromosome has no second Y to recombine with, so it is passed from father to son with almost no change other than mutations. This makes the DNA on the Y chromosome very useful to test for genealogy purposes. The Short Tandem Repeat (STR) count on the Y changes frequently enough, every few hundred years or so, for paternal line (paternity) testing whereas the Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutations on the Y are more indicative of deeper ancestry in the thousands of years.  Since the mitochondria only come from the mother, mtDNA testing gives information about the maternal line deep ancestry. Currently less useful for genealogy other than to disprove a maternal line of descent when the haplogroup does not match.

Haplogroups

The various mutations of Y chromosomes from the original common ancestor of us all have been cataloged and assigned to groups known as haplogroups. These tell you much about the locations of your thousands of years back ancestors. ISOGG maintains the most current list of Y haplogroups and has a good write up of genetic genealogy basics. There are also haplogroups for mtDNA. So the completely male or female line can be traced back into prehistory this way. Eupedia.com has a nice set of maps and origin explanations for all these haplogroups.

DNA Testing Basics for Genealogy

Because the Y chromosome and mtDNA get passed down along only one line of your ancestry, Y: fathers to sons, mtDNA: mothers to daughters, testing them is a much clearer and easy to understand process. Meg Smolenyak’s book, Trace Your Roots with DNA: Using Genetic Tests to Explore Your Family Tree is the best introduction to the use of these tests for genealogy and tracing your roots that I have found.

However autosomal DNA testing, that is testing chromosomes 1-22 for the most important markers, is the most frequent and comprehensive tool being used. This is the type of test offered by 23andme, Ancestry.com, MyHeritage.com and the family finder test at Family Tree DNA. The problem is that it is so amorphous that it is hard to understand. Autosomal DNA inheritance is quite random and becomes more so the more generations the DNA passes through which many find frustrating.

Click here for my slides from my presentation “You DNA Tested,  Now What? which discusses ethnicity results and haplogroups, but mainly focuses on how to use your DNA results for cousin matching and genealogy. Click here for a slightly more advanced presentation “New Tools for DNA Cousin Matching which discusses the latest tools from the testing companies to help figure out your DNA cousin relationships.

There are a number of books on the basics of using DNA testing, but the field changes rapidly. The newest and perhaps best book these days is Blaine Bettingers’s The Family Tree Guide to DNA Testing and Genetic Genealogy. Also see my book recommendations on the DNA-NEWBIE FAQ.

I also recommend Kelly Wheaton’s series of free online lessons on Genetic Genealogy highly for learning more about DNA testing:
https://wheatonwood.com/introduction-to-genetic-genealogy-dead-people-can-talk-after-all/

 

Can you find new relatives with autosomal DNA testing?

To find relatives you contact the people with whom you have the most matching DNA shown at your testing company or GEDmatch. More than one matching segment of at least 7-10 cM is a good starting criteria for finding closer relatives. Single segment matches of that size can be anything from 4th cousins out to 14th cousins. Overlapping segments are the key. If you overlap with more then one person and they match each other at the same spot (called triangulation) then all three of you share an ancestor, so exchange family trees and see if you can find him or her!

Click here for my blog post on finding DNA relatives which explains how to find the matching segment data. I also did a post that shows the step by step usage of the tools at 23andme.

Personally I have had great success finding new Norwegian cousins with DNA: 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and further; but very little success on my German or half Ashkenazi side. One thing I have discovered is that DNA can persist through many more generations than expected. So I googled and found a good article which I link to from my blog post on single segment matches.

The ISOGG wiki has a chart of the expected amount of DNA shared with your various relatives which is very useful in determining how close a relationship might be. The problem is that if a population is very endogamous, that relationships will appear closer than they are. This is very apparent with Ashkenazi DNA and I even sometimes find that cousins who look close in Norway are not, rather we share more than one common ancestor.

This online calculator lets you enter the centimorgans or percentage shared with a match and will give you the probability for the different possible relationships: https://dnapainter.com/tools/sharedcmv4

Testing

What is your objective in doing this testing? If it is solving a genealogical brick wall let me know how you did. I solved the one that started me on this testing path (see the post on Lars Monsen) and another one along the way. If it is curiosity and finding more relatives then enjoy and read on.

I have summarized the testing companies and my thoughts on them on my DNA testing page.

[printicon align=”right”]

This entry was posted on December 6, 2012, in . 68 Comments

Our DNA test results

 Mitochondrial DNA is the DNA in your cells’ mitochondria which only comes from your mother; it is abbreviated to mtDNA. It can be used to learn more about your maternal ancestry although it is slow to mutate. The Y chromosome is passed almost intact from father to son, only a tiny portion at one one end recombines with the X chromosome and it mutates more rapidly; so it is extremely useful for tracing paternal ancestry. All the other chromosomes recombine and the science of using them to find relatives and ancestors is fairly young. That is called autosomal DNA testing. The more large segment matches on chromosomes 1-22 that you have with someone, the more closely you are related. Kitty has ten segments in common with her 2nd cousin Dick Larkin and Shipley has seven. With our Skjold/Wold 2nd cousin we share much more DNA. Kitty has 15 large segments and Shipley has 13 while Dad has a whopping 25 segments. Kitty has five segments in common with her double third cousin and Shipley has seven. See my DNA basics page for more information about what this all means.

So many of my family members have tested their DNA that I have created a special category for them all called Our Family Results. I used to list them all here but there are too many now!

Since the Y chromosome is passed almost unchanged from father to son, the tiny mutations on the Y give us a history of the migrations of the human race. These get assigned to haplogroups on the Y tree so the haplogroup you belong to gives you your deep ancestry. We Norwegian Munsons are R1b-L238 (and more, see below)

Dad tested his Y chromosome at Family Tree DNA so we could get his STR values (see my post on that) and break the brick wall at his 4th grandad. Since then we have tested many SNPs as well to get the deep ancestry from his Y haplogroup.

Kitty started this journey at the National Geographic Genographic Project so has her mtDNA at Family Tree DNA as well as her transferred 23andme results.

For deep ancestry we know these haplogroups:

Direct Ancestor Family Haplogroups as shown in Paul Hawthorne’s colorful ancestry chart

 

Margarette Wittmann H11

 

Kitty, Shipley, Stasi, Trudi and presumably all our Thannhauser side first cousins are mtDNA H11 or H11a which goes up the Bavarian Catholic side to Margarette Wittman’s grandmother Veronika Engl. Haplogroup H is the most frequent in Europe at about 40% according to the Europedia article on H. The Wikipedia article claims the H11 subclade of H is mainly found in Central Europe. According to http://www.genealogywise.com/group/haplogrouph11 this haplogroup, H11, is 48,000 years old.

Regina Gundelfinger Gugenheimer K1a1b1a

Regina Gundelfinger Gugenheimer K1a1b1a

Our German Jewish Thannhauser grandfather‘s maternal mtDNA haplogroup, which goes back to Regina Gundelfinger (1784 -1858) of Regensburg, is now known to be K1a1b1a, a primarily Ashkenazi haplogroup.

Lauritz Andresen Monsen R1b etc

 

Shipley and Dad, so the MUNSON line, are Y haplogroup R1b1b2a1a according to 23andme which uses an older version of the Y tree, aka  (R-M269, L52+). Better to use the ISOGG  R Haplogroup chart which  classifies him and cousins Dick and George as R1b1a2a1a   L11/PF6539/S127, L52/PF6541, L151/PF6542, P310/PF6546/S129, P311/PF6545/S128. Actually the latest proposal is to use the terminal SNP for naming so then it would be called R1b-P312. This goes up the Norwegian side from original immigrant Lauritz Andresen (Monsen) to Lars Monsen to his ancestor Mons Knutson Titland of Hamre parish Hordaland.  This farm Titland originally belonged to a Scottish noble and this is a Scottish haplogroup so perhaps?

variant call anc der
R1b1b2a1a defining mutations
rs13304168 (L52) T C T
rs9785659 (P311) G A G
rs9786076 (L11) C T C
rs9786283 (P310) C A C
R1b1b2a1 defining mutations
variant call anc der
rs9786140 (L51) A G A

We just got back results for the Munson Y that we are positive for P312 so now we are R-P312 aka  R1b1a2a1a2 via current ISOGG R page. So of course I could not resist getting the P312 SNP pack to see what more I could learn.

The results are in. We are R1b-L238 (Y11662) which might mean we were Swedish before we were Norwegian (shocking!). L238 is the Scandinavian branch of those European invading R1b warriors with their horses and bronze and Y11662 is the Swedish subgroup (includes some Scots and Norwegians of course). See the migration map here: http://cache.eupedia.com/images/content/R1b-migration-map.jpg
read about us R1b folk here: http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_R1b_Y-DNA.shtml

Cousins Dick and George are listed at 23andme as this same haplogroup even though they are not related to the Munson paternal line in genealogical times! The R1b haplogroup is extremely frequent along the Atlantic and Baltic coasts according to Wikipedia, “The frequency is about 71% in Scotland, 70% in Spain and 60% in France. In south-eastern England the frequency of this clade is about 70%; in parts of the rest of north and western EnglandSpainPortugalWales and Ireland, it is as high as 90%. (So not surprising that cousin George with French Y-DNA and our 2nd cousin Dick Larkin with colonial English ancestors are also R1b1a2a1a1 aka  (R-M269, L52+). According to Europedia which has nice maps,  R1b is associated with the indo-european invasion of Europe after the neolithic age. A more in depth advanced discussion of recent R1b research is on the Eurogene Blog

Anna Knutsdatter Wold H5a1

Dad and cousins George and Henry are mtDNA H5a1 which comes to them from Maren Wold Lee’s mother g-grandmother Anna Wold.  Sadly this haplogroup is a risk factor for late onset Alzheimers. Anna looks somewhat like a native American so perhaps has Sammi ancestors. Her furthest back known maternal ancestor is Ragnhild Talleivsdtr Selstad  circa 1625-1692 Telemark, Norge. This I found from meeting some very helpful Norwegian cousins online who match our autosomal DNA. Other distant relatives had already put her ancestry (the Glaim family) on Geni back to the 1300s.

Josephine Halling T2b

Dick Larkin is mtDNA T2b which comes to him from our original immigrant ancestress Josephine Halling, wife of Lauritz Monsen, who wrote the family lullaby (her uncles were musical too, we think this is where it comes from in all of us). Her furthest back known maternal ancestress as researched by Dick is Joran Neilsdatter Grundeland, 1691 – October 11, 1769, Sør-Audnedal, Vest-Agder, Norway. Wikepedia describes the mtDNA group T quoting ISOGG this way: “”The mitochondrial Haplogroup T is best characterized as a European lineage. With an origin in the Near East greater than 45,000 years ago, the major sub-lineages of Haplogroup T entered Europe around the time of the Neolithic 10,000 years ago. Once in Europe, these sub-lineages underwent a dramatic expansion associated with the arrival of agriculture in Europe. Today, we find Haplogroup T*, the root Haplogroup for Haplogroup T, widely distributed in Europe.”

Jørgen Oleson Wold 1816-1892

Jørgen Oleson Wold – I1 1816-1892

Our Wold cousin is the classic Nordic Y haplogroup I1 which comes to him from our g-grandfather Jørgen Oleson Wold. This branch developed in isolation in Scandinavia about 20,000 years ago. According to Europedia, “Men belonging to this haplogroup all descend from a single ancestor who lived between 10,000 and 7,000 years ago.”

Our Skjold 3rd cousin does not share either his straight paternal or maternal ancestry with us but his paternal line is from the same part of Norway as our Skjold family and he is Y haplogroup I1* which is a classic scandinavian Y haplogroup and his mtDNA is H10.

I also got a Steinhardt cousin (directly descended from Isaak Steinhardt  of Floss, the g-grandfather of Charlotte Langermann Thannhauser) to test who is Y haplogroup T1. This haplogroup may have been spread by the Phoenicians and comes from the Levant according to http://www.eupedia.com/europe/origins_haplogroups_europe.shtml#T

Finally, a direct line Kutz descendant from our ancestor Alexander Kutz is J1e, a known Ashkenazi group (also known as J1-P58) and there are numerous subgroups downstream one of which is the Cohanim group which he may or may not belong to. Only further testing will tell.

 

 

This entry was posted on November 2, 2012, in . 12 Comments