Archives

Updates on Ancestry to your Origins

Oct17

Ancestry just did its yearly update to how it categorizes your biological ancestry by adding over 150 new regions.  Many areas like Ireland, Scotland, Central Europe, indigenous America, Asia, and Africa have more detailed subgroups than before and I noticed two new countries in Europe: Belgium and Switzerland.

Ancestry uses both its reference panels and the many family trees it has to make those determinations. Plus for some of us, they have added a break-out by grandparent, that will be discussed in my next blog. My post on last year’s updates (click here) summarized much of the information in their white papers about how they do this. Notice that they include places that have been settled by Europeans, for example Madeira and Arcadia, where people have been there long enough to become a distinct group genetically.

Sample Tennessean with deep colonial roots

Since I have helped many people with their results, I can see how their predictions have changed over time. Any regions that are newly being reported have a big green NEW label next to them. I highly recommend scrolling to the bottom of the list of regions and clicking on “View previous results and FAQs” in order to see what has changed for you.

Many people have seen a simplification of their results where some of the unusual 1% and 2% categories have disappeared. This is particularly evident in those who are European Jewish who now show only one or two totally jewish groups and no longer the oddball 1% this or that. My own results now correctly show 50% Norwegian from my Dad who was 100% Norwegian American. I knew I could not have 1% Irish which showed up in 2025, but I was confident of my 1% Finnish because other companies find that as well. Perhaps I am suffering from confirmation bias.

Here are my current results which have added some interesting new areas from my Bavarian grandmother:

I have a second cousin who was 100% Scandinavian in the first Ancestry Origins so I called her my “perfect” cousin and featured her in many past posts on this subject. She is now 98% Norwegian and 2% Swedish having lost her 1% Finnish, like me, plus her swedish is now smaller.

There are many new areas in Africa, Asia, and Indigenous America. The full list of 126 regions can be seen in the white paper (click here) on pages 7 and 8. If you click on an region name in your list, you will be taken to a description of that locale and its peoples’ history plus there will usually be three matches listed which share that region. If you have a lot of close family who have tested, those matches will not be useful. It would be great if you could filter your main match list by these ancestry composition areas.

Let’s look at some of the more interesting results:

Continue reading →

My Fastest Father Find Ever

Jan9

Randi contacted me for help finding her unknown biological father. I advised her to test at Ancestry and get back in touch when her results were ready.

When they came in, it took only three hours to find Randi’s unknown biological dad! She had two second cousin level matches at Ancestry with good trees who did not match each other. That meant that the search would likely be easy, since all I had to do was find where those two trees intersected. Here is how I did that, step by step.

First I created a private searchable tree at Ancestry to use for this case. I started it with Randi and her mom. planning to make floating branches for related people by copying the relevant lines over from their trees.

The best DNA match on Randi’s unknown father’s side was Brad at 322 cM. So using ProTools, I sorted the matches Randi and he shared by his closest matches, as shown in the image below.

Clicking on the sort button brings up a box where you can select to sort by the match’s relationship

The idea was to find the common ancestor among those matches. This would be the line that Randi is related on. To do that, I should have looked at the best one with a tree, excluding close family, but I saw that there was one a bit further down the list, Bob, who had an unusual surname, call it Roper, that was the same as one of Brad’s great grandmothers. So I built her tree back up a few generations and down again. I then copied Bob’s paternal ancestors over, looking for an intersection. I did not find one, so I moved on. Later Brad told me that the error was two women with the same name and birth year incorrectly in various trees, including his.

So I went back to the common match list and found the best match to Brad with a tree (Peggy). One of her grandmothers shared a surname, call it Whistler, with the husband of the Roper great grandmother. So I built the Whistler tree. Quickly found a common ancestor for Peggy and Brad with an unusual first name born in 1830. Built the tree of all his descendants. Somewhere in that tree will be our man.

Time to look at the other possible second cousin match, Jim, at 268 cM. The plan was to repeat the process of finding the common ancestor to his best match with a tree. However, his surname, call it Wander, had already showed up in the Whistler tree. Having collected all the descendants of Brad’s Whistler great grandparents, I noticed that one of them had married a Wander. Was that Wander in Jim’s tree? Yes, she was his aunt!

That Whistler-Wander couple, who must be Randi’s ancestors, had two children, a boy and a girl. The boy was the right age and in the right location. Could it really be this easy? Yes. The details of his life fit what was known. Since Randi’s presumed father is Jim’s first cousin, Jim is Randi’s first cousin once removed.

Continue reading →

The new clustering tool at Ancestry

Jul6

Ancestry has been rolling out its clustering feature this past week to those of us with a Pro Tools subscription. If you have it, there is a new button at the top of your list of matches with an icon that says “By Cluster.”

The purpose of clustering is to create an easy-to-use visual way of organizing DNA matches that are related to you and to each other. The graphic sorts the matches who share 65 cM to 1,300 cM with you into groups who also share at least 20 cM with each other. Each match is listed in the rows on the left as well as by initials at the top for each column. In a perfect world, you would get four colored boxes, like in the image below, where each box represents the line of one of your grandparents.

The image above has actually had the top box truncated and two additional boxes removed for illustration purposes. The left side would have the full name of the match while the top has just the initials.

Some matches will also have additional matching that does not fit the groupings. Those are shown in gray.The darker boxes on the diagonal are where the same person meets themself. Note that all the boxes, even the ones that are not colored, are clickable to show who the two people that intersect there are, with all the details of that match. Plus the names can be clicked to go to those match pages. Clicking a square brings up a box like in this image.


Below the diagram there is  a list of the clusters. Click on any one to see the members of that group. Notice that each member has all the information you would see about that person in your match list. Another nice feature is that you can add everyone in a cluster to a colored dot group by clicking on the “+ Add All” button.


While this sounds like a wonderful new tool, for many of us it needs the ability to specify the range to include in order to get the best boxes. Below is what a Jewish friend of mine gets; lots of clear small boxes, but everyone is related to everyone else outside of the clusters, except for her middle box. This is what endogamy looks like!

Continue reading →

A Breakthrough in my German DNA

Jun17

Modern day Germans do not seem to do DNA testing. I have one German grandparent born in Munich, with several generations of Bavarian ancestors, whose line I never get any matches to. Since this is my mother’s mother’s line with the paternal lines proven, the lack of matches is not due to an NPE (non parental event). For example, I have one German half 2nd cousin on my maternal grandmother’s father’s side who tested at my request (click here for that post).

Ancestry has a nice new feature where you can filter your matches by Journeys (where your ancestors came from); see image to the left. I was disappointed not to have any German journeys, but my brother has something called Franconia. When I used that filter I found a good match at the top of his list. Richard, from Pennsylvania (think Pennsylvania Dutch aka Deutsch), with an Italian surname, shares 72cM with my brother, 62 cM with me, and 25 cM with our first cousin Margaret. Richard’s tree had no ancestors listed, but his closest shared match to us, a great nephew, did have a small tree. One thing I like to do with my Pro Tools is to change the way matches are sorted to be by the best ones for the match I am looking at, rather than the usual sort of those closest to me (see image below). Their close matches often have better trees or have notes I wrote to myself when I figured them out long ago.

That nephew has all but one person showing as private in his tree. Luckily the one person whose name shows has the same surname as Richard. Next I clicked over to her profile page and used the Ancestry search function to find a more complete tree for her, which included her parents. Her mother Frances had a surname, LANG, that I knew was in my tree. She was even born in the same town, Eslarn, Bavaria, as my great grandmother Margaretha Wittman! Another search at ancestry found Francis’ Eslarn grandparents’ names in yet another tree, whose owner was also a distant DNA match.

There is a useful German website – https://www.ortsfamilienbuecher.de/ – which has genealogy information from many German town lineage books, including the one for Eslarn. You can list everyone with a specific surname in your town to search for an individual. Be sure to check alternate spellings. Armed with the names of Frances Lang’s grandparents, I went to that source and traced her mother back to my great grandmother’s grandparents. This was not easy because the same names were used over and over again. Frances’ mother had the same name as my great grandmother. Also their fathers, who were uncle and nephew, had the same name, Joseph Widmann/Wittman. Complicated to figure this out, but birth years helped.

Continue reading →

New Sort Option for the Ancestry Pro Tools DNA Match List!

Nov1

Many of us got the Ancestry Pro Tools to see how our matches were related to each other; then we got frustrated when there were many pages of matches that could not be sorted by the closest matches to that match.  Look at the image below. The sort feature we wanted is here!

On the far right above your match list it now says Group Search Sort. If you click the sort button, it pops up a little box which gives you the option to sort by your closest matches, your match’s closest matches, or by the date.

The advantage of sorting by your match’s matches is that you can now quickly see if you have already solved the relationship to one of their close family members. The first few words of whatever you put in the notes for that match are listed. Plus if Ancestry has found a relationship there is a little three person icon. More on the basics of the pro tools are in my June blog post (click here). Meanwhile, if this has not rolled out to your pro tools account yet, there is a workaround mentioned by Leah Larkin in her facebook group – The DNA Roundtable – just add
?sort=MATCHING_RELATIONSHIP
to the end of the URL on the page with your match

Remember, this new feature only works if you have the Ancestry Pro Tools which I have heard are on sale for the Holidays at a bargain price